Lotteries with jackpots of up to £25,000 are being run by local authorities in the UK in a bid to raise funds for cultural activities and events.

Middlesbrough agreed on Thursday to join more than 60 councils running weekly lotteries, with more consideration needed going forward.

People providing addiction support services questioned whether councils were providing a “gateway to gambling”.

Experts said although weekly lotteries were a “low-risk” form of gambling, there was no such thing as “no risk”.

Middlesbrough said coronavirus had had a “serious impact” on its finances.

Chris Hill, from Sidcup, who recovered from a gambling addiction several years ago, said councils – one in six of which are running similar weekly lotteries – should be “more responsible” by looking elsewhere with their fundraising.

“They should be looking at the long-term effects of this and whether this is a gateway to further gambling,” he said.

The 47-year-old, who now runs support services for those battling addiction, said: “If there’s even a 1% risk [lotteries] are going to cause pain and someone might pick up a gambling addiction, should they be doing it?”

The Gambling Commission classes lotteries as “low-risk products”.

Dr Mark Griffiths, Professor of Behavioural Addiction at Nottingham Trent University, agrees but said councils who set up lotteries had a “duty of care” to players.

He said: “It’s not to say people cannot have problems. For example, you can decide you want to spend £50 a week on tickets – which could be indicative of a problem for an individual, depending on their disposable income.”

The debate over Council-run lotteries vs National Lotteries

Of the local lotteries set up by councils in the UK, those registered with the Gambling Commission are run by a private company, Gatherwell, which operates them in a different way to the National Lottery.

Players pay £1 online each week and select a line of six numbers. There is a jackpot of £25,000 at a million to one odds, with smaller cash prizes or vouchers also on offer.

For the majority of draws, 50% of every ticket goes to a range of causes selected by the council, while a further 10% goes to a central pot for the council to use. This compares to roughly 25% of the ticket cost going to good causes in the National Lottery.

There are some general restrictions placed on council lotteries, but other local restrictions may apply, such as limited ticket purchases.

Professor Annie Anderson, president of the UK Society of Behavioural Medicine, said lotteries were not risk-free for players and despite the money going to good causes, the mission of councils was “not to introduce people” to gambling.

“The concept that something is going back into the local community as a result of the lottery may mean people are more motivated,” she said.

“If that’s what starts people gambling, questions need to be asked about whether this is the best way to raise funds.”

Ben Speare, managing director of Gatherwell, said there were many safeguards in place to protect players.

He said staff monitored the number of tickets held by each player and would contact those with more than 20.

“After years of austerity… we’re [enabling councils to raise] about £3m a year for local services, which for some is the difference between existing and not existing,” Mr Speare said.

“It enables it to be a bit of fun, and people play to support good causes, not win the jackpot.”

Mr Speare said each lottery raises £40,000 a year for good causes.

A Gambling Commission spokeswoman said: “We know that some society lottery players may be a problem for at-risk gamblers. We expect operators to act in line with our social responsibility requirements to protect consumers from harm.”



Categorized in: